Skip to content

Googles internet bandwidth may be free

It was reported a few months ago that YouTube might be costing Google $US500m a year in bandwidth charges. Yet consumer devices like the Flip and iPod Nano are making it even easier to push video up to YouTube. YouTube is now serving over 1 Billion videos a day.

But today …

YouTube’s Bandwidth Bill Is Zero. Welcome to the New Net

But the lack of a monthly bill in the mailbox doesn’t mean Google’s internet connection is free — it’s just that it has purchased unused fiber optic cable known as “dark fiber” — and uses it to carry its traffic to other networks where it “peers” or trades traffic with other ISPs. Its costs for bandwidth are then amortized across the life of its fiber and routers.

Google is becoming one of the biggest investors in international fibre and combining that with a substantial content distribution network.

All this is very behind the scenes but you can sense that the Internet is changing slowly from being dominated by traditional Telco players who solely monetize on bandwidth used to content providers that can monetize via the information and commerce opportunities contained in the transported bits.

This is interesting for a remote country such as New Zealand as we start to drive demand for competition on our international links, such as the new Tasman cable proposed by Kordia.

MAP1

Small, remote countries are going to need a lot more bandwidth or risk a digital divide with other countries.  But relying on traditional Telco models no longer makes sense.  The economics of fibre have moved up a layer into the content space.  Therefore, new cable initiatives need to be considered on these new models and no doubt in partnership with the global content providers.

The discussion needs to lift up a level.

 

Read more about Technology

 

2 comments

John Humphrey
21 October 2009 #

Google purchased a lot of international dark fibre during the dot.com and telco downturn in 2001 – 2004 when operators who don’t normally sell dark fibre grabbed the Google lifeline.

If NZ had a big low cost intenational fibre link and tax incentives; we could attract players here for diversity hosting / data centres etc for their CDNs – even with the increased latency.

Adam
22 October 2009 #

Interesting note about the dark-fibre buy-up during the last bubble. I wonder who’s taking the initiative this time?

As for CDN hosting in NZ? Never. No way. The latency is a double hit, one on the request and one of the download, and would totally defeat the point of a CDN for international data.

NZ seems to have other big problems for hosting. Namely we live on a fault line, and we have poor infrastructure (thinking of Auckland’s blackouts).

Add your comment





We welcome all feedback but prefer a real name and email address.